Convectively Coupled Equatorial Waves Simulated by CAMS-CSM

+ Author Affiliations + Find other works by these authors
Funds: 
Supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC1505801), National Natural Science Foundation of China (41705059), and Startup Foundation for Introducing Talent of NUIST

PDF

  • The Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences developed a Climate System Model (CAMS-CSM) to participate in the upcoming Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 (CMIP6). In this study, we assessed the model performance in simulating the convectively coupled equatorial waves (CCEWs) by comparing the daily output of precipitation from a 23-yr coupled run with the observational precipitation data from Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP). Four dominant modes of CCEWs including the Kelvin, equatorial Rossby (ER), mixed Rossby–gravity (MRG), tropical depression-type (TD-type) waves, and their annual mean and seasonal cycle characteristics are investigated respectively. It is found that the space–time spectrum characteristics of each wave mode represented by tropical averaged precipitation could be very well simulated by CAMS-CSM, including the magnitudes and the equivalent depths. The zonal distribution of wave associated precipitation is also well simulated, with the maximum centers over the Indian Ocean and the Pacific Ocean. However, the meridional distribution of the wave activities is poorly simulated, with the maximum centers shifted from the Northern Hemisphere to the Southern Hemisphere, especially the Kelvin, MRG, and TD waves. The seasonal cycle of each wave mode is generally captured by the model, but their amplitudes over the Southern Hemisphere during boreal winter are grossly overestimated. The reason for the excessive wave activity over the southern Pacific Ocean in the simulation is discussed.
  • Fig.  1.   Zonal wavenumber–frequency power of precipitation over 15°S–15°N divided by the background spectrum based on (a) observation (OBS) and (b) CAMS-CSM output. Superimposed are the dispersion curves of equatorial waves for the three equivalent depths of 8, 25, and 90 m. The signals with positive (negative) zonal wave number propagate eastward (westward). Note: cpd denotes cycle per day.

    Fig.  2.   As in Fig. 1, but for estimates of the Northern Hemisphere (0°–15°N, a and b) and Southern Hemisphere (15°S–0°, c and d), respectively. The left panels are based on observational data, while the right panels are based on CAMS-CSM output. The signals with positive (negative) zonal wave number propagate eastward (westward).

    Fig.  3.   Zonal distributions of annual mean standard deviation (STD) of precipitation (Pr) filtered for the Kelvin (red), ER (blue), MRG (green), and TD-type (purple) waves averaged over 15°S to 15°N. The solid lines represent the observation and the dashed lines represent the simulation results.

    Fig.  4.   Horizontal distributions of annual mean standard deviation of precipitation filtered for (a, b) Kelvin, (c, d) ER, (e, f) MRG, and (g, h) TD-type waves. The left (right) panels represent the observation (simulation).

    Fig.  5.   Seasonal evolution of zonal-mean wave activity for (a, e) Kelvin, (b, f) ER, (c, g) MRG, and (d, h) TD-type waves. The upper (lower) panels represent the observation (simulation).

    Fig.  6.   Seasonal evolution of meridional-mean wave activity for (a, e) Kelvin, (b, f) ER, (c, g) MRG, and (d, h) TD-type waves. The first and third rows are average over the Northern Hemisphere while the second and fourth rows are average over the Southern Hemisphere. The upper (lower) panels represent the observation (simulation).

    Fig.  7.   Climatological mean precipitation (shaded, mm day−1) and SST (contours with interval of 1°C) during (a, b) boreal winter (November–April) and (c, d) boreal summer (May–October) for (a, c) observation and (b, d) simulation. The red contours represent SST of 29°C

    Table  1   Spectrum domains for filtering different CCEW modes

    KelvinERMRGTD-type
    Period (day)3–20 10–30 3–102.5–5
    Wavenumber2–14−10 to −2−10 to −1 −15 to −5
    Equivalent depth (m)8–90 8–90 8–90Not specified
    Download: Download as CSV
  • Chen, L., T. Li, and Y. Q. Yu, 2015: Causes of strengthening and weakening of ENSO amplitude under global warming in four CMIP5 models. J. Climate, 28, 3250–3274. doi: 10.1175/jcli-d-14-00439.1
    Chen, L., W. P. Zheng, and P. Braconnot, 2019: Towards understanding the suppressed ENSO activity during mid-Holocene in PMIP2 and PMIP3 simulations. Climate Dyn., 53, 1095–1110. doi: 10.1007/s00382-019-04637-z
    Dai, Y. J., X. B. Zeng, R. E. Dickinson, et al., 2003: The Common Land Model. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 84, 1013–1024. doi: 10.1175/BAMS-84-8-1013
    DeMott, C. A., C. Stan, D. A. Randall, et al., 2011: The Asian monsoon in the superparameterized CCSM and its relationship to tropical wave activity. J. Climate, 24, 5134–5156. doi: 10.1175/2011JCLI4202.1
    Griffies, S. M., M. J. Harrison, P. C. Pacanowski, et al., 2004: A Technical Guide to MOM4. GFDL Ocean Group Technical Report No. 5, Princeton, NJ, NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dy- namics Laboratory, 339 pp.
    Huang, P., and R. H. Huang, 2011: Climatology and interannual variability of convectively coupled equatorial waves activity. J. Climate, 24, 4451–4465. doi: 10.1175/2011JCLI4021.1
    Huang, P., C. Chou, and R. H. Huang, 2013: The activity of convectively coupled equatorial waves in CMIP3 global climate models. Theor. Appl. Climatol., 112, 697–711. doi: 10.1007/s00704-012-0761-4
    Huffman, G. J., R. F. Adler, M. M. Morrissey, et al., 2001: Global precipitation at one-degree daily resolution from multisatellite observations. J. Hydrometeor., 2, 36–50. doi: 10.1175/1525-7541(2001)002<0036:GPAODD>2.0.CO;2
    Janicot, S., F. Mounier, S. Gervois, et al., 2010: The dynamics of the West African monsoon. Part V: The detection and role of the dominant modes of convectively coupled equatorial Rossby waves. J. Climate, 23, 4005–4024. doi: 10.1175/2010JCLI3221.1
    Kawamura, R., T. Murakami, and B. Wang, 1996: Tropical and mid-latitude 45-day perturbations over the western Pacific during the northern summer. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 74, 867–890. doi: 10.2151/jmsj1965.74.6_867
    Kiladis, G. N., M. C. Wheeler, P. T. Haertel, et al., 2009: Convectively coupled equatorial waves. Rev. Geophys., 47, RG2003. doi: 10.1029/2008rg000266
    Lau, K.-H., and N.-C. Lau, 1990: Observed structure and propagation characteristics of tropical summertime synoptic scale disturbances. Mon. Wea. Rev., 118, 1888–1913. doi: 10.1175/1520-0493(1990)118<1888:OSAPCO>2.0.CO;2
    Li, G., and S.-P. Xie, 2014: Tropical biases in CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: The excessive equatorial Pacific cold tongue and double ITCZ problems. J. Climate, 27, 1765–1780. doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00337.1
    Lin, J.-L., G. N. Kiladis, B. E. Mapes, et al., 2006: Tropical intraseasonal variability in 14 IPCC AR4 climate models. Part I: Convective signals. J. Climate, 19, 2665–2690. doi: 10.1175/JCLI3735.1
    Madden, R. A., and P. R. Julian, 1994: Observations of the 40–50-day tropical oscillation—A review. Mon. Wea. Rev., 122, 814–837. doi: 10.1175/1520-0493(1994)122<0814:OOTDTO>2.0.CO;2
    Matsuno, T., 1966: Quasi-geostrophic motions in the equatorial area. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 44, 25–43. doi: 10.2151/jmsj1965.44.1_25
    Nordeng, T. E., 1994: Extended Versions of the Convective Para- meterization Scheme at ECMWF and Their Impact on the Mean and Transient Activity of the Model in the Tropics. Technical Memorandum 206, Reading, UK, ECMWF, 41 pp.
    Oueslati, B., and G. Bellon, 2015: The double ITCZ bias in CMIP5 models: Interaction between SST, large-scale circulation and precipitation. Climate Dyn., 44, 585–607. doi: 10.1007/s00382-015-2468-6
    Rayner, N. A., D. E. Parker, E. B. Horton, et al., 2003: Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 108, 4407. doi: 10.1029/2002JD002670
    Rong, X. Y., J. Li, H. M. Chen, et al., 2018: The CAMS climate system model and a basic evaluation of its climatology and climate variability simulation. J. Meteor. Res., 32, 839–861. doi: 10.1007/s13351-018-8058-x
    Roundy, P. E., and W. M. Frank, 2004: A climatology of waves in the equatorial region. J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 2105–2132. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<2105:ACOWIT>2.0.CO;2
    Roundy, P. E., C. J. Schreck III, and M. A. Janiga, 2009: Contributions of convectively coupled equatorial Rossby waves and Kelvin waves to the real-time multivariate MJO indices. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 469–478. doi: 10.1175/2008MWR2595.1
    Straub, K. H., and G. N. Kiladis, 2002: Observations of a convectively coupled Kelvin wave in the eastern Pacific ITCZ. J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 30–53. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<0030:OOACCK>2.0.CO;2
    Straub, K. H., G. N. Kiladis, and P. E. Ciesielski, 2006: The role of equatorial waves in the onset of the South China Sea summer monsoon and the demise of El Niño during 1998. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans, 42, 216–238. doi: 10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2006.02.005
    Tiedtke, M., 1989: A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parameterization in large-scale models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 117, 1779–1800. doi: 10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<1779:ACMFSF>2.0.CO;2
    Ventrice, M. J., C. D. Thorncroft, and M. A. Janiga, 2012a: Atlantic tropical cyclogenesis: A three-way interaction between an African easterly wave, diurnally varying convection, and a convectively coupled atmospheric Kelvin wave. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 1108–1124. doi: 10.1175/MWR-D-11-00122.1
    Ventrice, M. J., C. D. Thorncroft, and C. J. Schreck III, 2012b: Impacts of convectively coupled Kelvin waves on environmental conditions for Atlantic tropical cyclogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 2198–2214. doi: 10.1175/MWR-D-11-00305.1
    Wang, L., and L. Chen, 2016: Interannual variation of convectively-coupled equatorial waves and their association with environmental factors. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans, 76, 116–126. doi: 10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2016.10.004
    Wang, L., and L. Chen, 2017: Effect of basic state on seasonal variation of convectively coupled Rossby wave. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans, 77, 54–63. doi: 10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2016.11.002
    Wang, L., and T. Li, 2017: Convectively coupled Kelvin waves in CMIP5 coupled climate models. Climate Dyn., 48, 767–781. doi: 10.1007/s00382-016-3109-4
    Wheeler, M., and G. N. Kiladis, 1999: Convectively coupled equatorial waves: Analysis of clouds and temperature in the wavenumber–frequency domain. J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 374–399. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<0374:CCEWAO>2.0.CO;2
    Wheeler, M., G. N. Kiladis, and P. J. Webster, 2000: Large-scale dynamical fields associated with convectively coupled equatorial waves. J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 613–640. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<0613:LSDFAW>2.0.CO;2
    Yang, G.-Y., B. Hoskins, and J. Slingo, 2007: Convectively coupled equatorial waves. Part I: Horizontal and vertical structures. J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 3406–3423. doi: 10.1175/JAS4017.1
    Zhang, X. X., H. L. Liu, and M. H. Zhang, 2015: Double ITCZ in coupled ocean–atmosphere models: From CMIP3 to CMIP5. Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 8651–8659. doi: 10.1002/2015GL065973
  • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(13)

    1. Xue Hao, Yan Zhang, Guangyuan Yu, et al. Online vertical measurement of air pollutants: Development of a monitoring platform on a skyscraper and its application in Shanghai. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 2022. DOI:10.1016/j.apr.2022.101477
    2. Di Huige, Li Siwen, Yuan Yun, et al. Observational study of the vertical aerosol and meteorological factor distributions with respect to particulate pollution in Xi'an. Atmospheric Environment, 2021, 247: 118215. DOI:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118215
    3. Manu Mehta, Richa Khushboo, Rahesh Raj, et al. Spaceborne observations of aerosol vertical distribution over Indian mainland (2009–2018). Atmospheric Environment, 2021, 244: 117902. DOI:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117902
    4. Tian Zhou, Hailing Xie, Tao Jiang, et al. Seasonal characteristics of aerosol vertical structure and autumn enhancement of non-spherical particle over the semi-arid region of northwest China. Atmospheric Environment, 2021, 244: 117912. DOI:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117912
    5. Zhizhong Sheng, Huizheng Che, Quanliang Chen, et al. Aerosol vertical distribution and optical properties of different pollution events in Beijing in autumn 2017. Atmospheric Research, 2019, 215: 193. DOI:10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.08.029
    6. Huibin Guo, Minxuan Chen. Short-term effect of air pollution on asthma patient visits in Shanghai area and assessment of economic costs. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2018, 161: 184. DOI:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.05.089
    7. Tian Luan, Xueliang Guo, Lijun Guo, et al. Quantifying the relationship between PM&lt;sub&gt;2.5&lt;/sub&gt; concentration, visibility and planetary boundary layer height for long-lasting haze and fog–haze mixed events in Beijing. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2018, 18(1): 203. DOI:10.5194/acp-18-203-2018
    8. Yanjun Ma, Hujia Zhao, Yunsheng Dong, et al. Comparison of Two Air Pollution Episodes over Northeast China in Winter 2016/17 Using Ground-Based Lidar. Journal of Meteorological Research, 2018, 32(2): 313. DOI:10.1007/s13351-018-7047-4
    9. Su-qin Han, Tian-yi Hao, Yu-fen Zhang, et al. Vertical observation and analysis on rapid formation and evolutionary mechanisms of a prolonged haze episode over central-eastern China. Science of The Total Environment, 2018, 616-617: 135. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.278
    10. Chunpeng Leng, Junyan Duan, Chen Xu, et al. Insights into a historic severe haze event in Shanghai: synoptic situation, boundary layer and pollutants. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2016, 16(14): 9221. DOI:10.5194/acp-16-9221-2016
    11. Jiansu Wei, Weijun Zhu, Duanyang Liu, et al. The Temporal and Spatial Distribution of Hazy Days in Cities of Jiangsu Province China and an Analysis of Its Causes. Advances in Meteorology, 2016, 2016: 1. DOI:10.1155/2016/6761504
    12. Hongnian Liu, Wanli Ma, Junlong Qian, et al. Effect of urbanization on the urban meteorology and air pollution in Hangzhou. Journal of Meteorological Research, 2015, 29(6): 950. DOI:10.1007/s13351-015-5013-y
    13. Adolfo Comerón, Ravil R. Agishev, Adolfo Comerón, et al. Generalization of optical, energy, and excess-noise parameters to compare capabilities of lidar with PMT/APD/SiPM. Remote Sensing of Clouds and the Atmosphere XXII, DOI:10.1117/12.2279145

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return