Improving the Extreme Rainfall Forecast of Typhoon Morakot (2009) by Assimilating Radar Data from Taiwan Island and Mainland China

+ Author Affiliations + Find other works by these authors
Funds: 
Supported by the National (Key) Basic Research and Development (973) Program of China (2013CB430300), China Meteorological Administration Special Public Welfare Research Fund (GYHY201506007), National Natural Science Foundation of China (40921160381, 41005033, 41275067, and 41475059), and Typhoon Scientific and Technological Innovation Group Fund of Shanghai Meteorological Service

PDF

  • This study examined the impact of an improved initial field through assimilating ground-based radar data from mainland China and Taiwan Island to simulate the long-lasting and extreme rainfall caused by Morakot (2009). The vortex location and the subsequent track analyzed through the radial velocity data assimilation (VDA) are generally consistent with the best track. The initial humidity within the radar detecting region and Morakot’s northward translation speed can be significantly improved by the radar reflectivity data assimilation (ZDA). As a result, the heavy rainfall on both sides of Taiwan Strait can be reproduced with the joint application of VDA and ZDA. Based on sensitivity experiments, it was found that, without ZDA, the simulated storm underwent an unrealistic inward contraction after 12-h integration, due to underestimation of humidity in the global reanalysis, leading to underestimation of rainfall amount and coverage. Without the vortex relocation via VDA, the moister (drier) initial field with (without) ZDA will produce a more southward (northward) track, so that the rainfall location on both sides of Taiwan Strait will be affected. It was further found that the improvement in the humidity field of Morakot is mainly due to assimilation of high-value reflectivity (strong convection) observed by the radars in Taiwan Island, especially at Kenting station. By analysis of parcel trajectories and calculation of water vapor flux divergence, it was also found that the improved typhoon circulation through assimilating radar data can draw more water vapor from the environment during the subsequent simulation, eventually contributing to the extreme rainfall on both sides of Taiwan Strait.
  • Fig.  1.   The observed composite radar reflectivity (dBZ) from Taiwan Island and mainland China every 6 h from 0600 UTC 7 August to 0000 UTC 9 August 2009, except for 1500 UTC 7 August 2009.

    Fig.  2.   The model domain with a resolution of 3 km. The solid circles denote the observed Typhoon Morakot locations every 6 h from 1200 UTC 7 August to 1200 UTC 9 August, based on the best-track data of the China Meteorological Administration. The locations of the radar stations (WZ, Wenzhou station; FZ, Fuzhou station; XM, Xiamen station; HL, Hualien station; ST, Shantou station; CG, Chigu station; KT, Kenting station) are marked by filled triangles, and their maximum ranges of coverage are indicated by the circles.

    Fig.  3.   Illustration of the experimental design and data assimilation (DA) scheme. Except for CTRL, with a 48-h forecast starting at 1200 UTC 7 August, the other experiments performed 45-h forecasts after 4-h DA cycles at 1500 UTC 7 August.

    Fig.  4.   Analysis increments of column-integrated water vapor (g kg–1) and horizontal wind (≥ 2.5 m s–1) at z = 3 km for (a–c) the first analysis at 1200 UTC 7 August and (d–f) the second analysis at 1300 UTC 7 August from (a, d) Exp-all, (b, e) Exp-dbz, and (c, f) Exp-rv.

    Fig.  5.   The increments of (a, c) tangential and (b, d) radial wind components at z = 3 km from Exp-all for (a, b) the first analysis at 1200 UTC 7 August and (c, d) the second analysis at 1300 UTC 7 August.

    Fig.  6.   Deviation of column-integrated analyzed water vapor (shading; g kg–1) from (a) CTRL, (b) Exp-all, (c) Exp-dbz, (d) Exp-rv, (e) Exp-ml, (f) Exp-tw, and (g) Exp-kt, at 1500 UTC 7 August, against the initial field at 1200 UTC 7 August (the typhoon symbols denote the locations of the simulated typhoon centers at 1500 UTC 7 August), and (h) the column-integrated water vapor (qv; g kg–1) of each experiment, every 120-km-width annular within 600 km from the CMA best track at 1500 UTC 7 August.

    Fig.  7.   Radius–time cross-sections of the azimuthally averaged (a) observed composite radar reflectivity (shading; dBZ), (b–e) simulated radar reflectivity (shading; dBZ), and (f–i) tangential wind (contour interval: 5 m s–1, with the heavy contour for 30 m s–1) at z = 3 km, and hourly accumulated rainfall (shading; mm) in (b, f) CTRL, (c, g) Exp-all, (d, h) Exp-dbz, and (e, i) Exp-rv from 1800 UTC 7 August to 0000 UTC 9 August (the dashed line denotes the radius of maximum wind).

    Fig.  8.   (a) The central minimum sea level pressure (MSLP; hPa) and (b) best track of Typhoon Morakot (from the China Meteorological Administration; black line with triangles) every 6 h from 1200 UTC 7 August to 1200 UTC 9 August, and the simulated tracks in CTRL (blue line with circles), Exp-all (red line with circles), Exp-dbz (khaki line with circles), and Exp-rv (green line with circles). (c) The forecast mean flow [full (half) barbs are 4 (2) m s–1] within 300–700 hPa and a radius of 600 km from the TC center from 1800 UTC 7 August to 0000 UTC 9 August.

    Fig.  9.   Horizontal distributions of 10-m winds ( m s–1) from (a) QuikSCAT observations and the numerical experiments of (b) CTRL, (c) Exp-all, (d) Exp-dbz, and (e) Exp-rv at around 1030 UTC 8 August.

    Fig.  10.   (a1–a4) Observed composite and (b1–b4) simulated radar reflectivity (color shading; dBZ) and wind vectors (full barb is 10 m s–1) at the fifth model level (η = 0.934), in (b1–b4) CTRL, (c1–c4) Exp-all, (d1–d4) Exp-dbz, and (e1–e4) Exp-rv at 1800 UTC 7 (first column), 0000 UTC 8 (second column), 1200 UTC 8 (third column), and 0000 UTC 9 August (fourth column).

    Fig.  11.   Maps of 24-h accumulated rainfall (mm) from 0000 UTC 8 August to 0000 UTC 9 August: (a) observed by rain gauges in Taiwan, and simulated by (b) CTRL, (c) Exp-all, (d) Exp-dbz, (e) Exp-rv, (f) Exp-ml, (g) Exp-tw, and (h) Exp-kt (the county boundaries are marked by black lines, and the number denotes the peak rainfall amount). (i) Equitable threat scores of 24-h accumulated rainfall verified against surface rain gauges in Taiwan Island and mainland China.

    Fig.  12.   As in Fig. 11, but for eastern China.

    Fig.  13.   (a) Valid points of radar reflectivity (≥ 15 dBZ, marked by crosses) at 3-km height and Morakot’s location (typhoon symbol) at 1500 UTC 7 August (final data assimilation cycle). The locations of radar stations (FZ, XM, HL, CG, and KT) are marked by black dots. (b) As in Fig. 8b, but for Exp-ml, Exp-tw, and Exp-kt.

    Fig.  14.   Fifteen-hour backward trajectories of air parcels near (a) Meishan at 0600 UTC 8 August (the center of the box with 600-km-long sides is the typhoon center at 1200 UTC 8 August), and (b–d) the vertical height of each parcel at 4.0 km (green points), 2.0 km (red points), 0.5 km (blue points) and above ground level every hour from 1500 UTC 7 August to 0600 UTC 8 August, based on the 1-h output of Exp-all. (e–h) As in (a–d), except for Zherong station. (i) Area-averaged [in the box in (a)] and vertically integrated horizontal flux divergence of water vapor [–1e–5 g (hPa m2s)–1] in every experiment.

    Fig.  15.   (a) Equitable threat score (ETS), (b) bias score above the 15-dBZ threshold, and (c) root-mean-square error (RMSE; dBZ) of hourly simulated composite radar reflectivity against observed composite radar reflectivity in Taiwan Island and mainland China from 1800 UTC 7 August to 0000 UTC 9 August.

    Fig.  16.   (a) Map of 24-h accumulated rainfall (mm) observed by the rain gauges in Taiwan Island and mainland China on 8 August. (b) Simulated track errors against the China Meteorological Administration best track every 6 h. (c, d) Hourly area-averaged rainfall in a 100-km2 box near (c) Meishan and (d) Zherong (shown in Fig. 15a), observed by rain gauges and simulated by CTRL, Exp-all, Exp-dbz, and Exp-rv from 0000 UTC 8 August to 0000 UTC 9 August.

    Fig.  17.   Time series of (a, f) observed and (b, g) CTRL simulated, (c, h) Exp-all simulated, (d, i) Exp-dbz simulated, and (e, j) Exp-rv simulated radar reflectivity (dBZ; color shading) and wind vectors (m s–1; full barb is 10 m s–1) at z = 3.0 km near (a–e) 27.25°N (Zherong) and (f–j) 23.27 °N (Meishan) from 1800 UTC 7 August to 0000 UTC 9 August.

    Table  1   Description of the experimental design

    Experiment Description
    CTRL No radar data assimilation
    Exp-all Assimilation of radial velocity and reflectivity
    Exp-dbz Assimilation of radar reflectivity only
    Exp-rv Assimilation of radial velocity only
    Exp-ml Assimilation of radar data from mainland China only
    Exp-tw Assimilation of radar data from Taiwan only
    Exp-kt Assimilation of radar data from Kenting station only
    Download: Download as CSV

    Table  2   Simulated track errors of each numerical experiment against the best track, and the mean ETS (equitable threat score), BS (bias score) and RMSE (root-mean-square error) of composite radar reflectivity from each numerical experiment against the observation every hour from 1800 UTC 7 to 0000 UTC 9 August 2009

    Experiment Track error (km) Mean ETS Mean BS Mean RMSE (dBZ)
    Max Min Mean
    CTRL 133.4 11.3 60.2 0.082 0.81 11.23
    Exp-all 77.7 0.0 33.4 0.110 0.92 11.44
    Exp-dbz 146.7 16.7 98.5 0.072 0.86 11.82
    Exp-rv 77.8 5.8 37.9 0.095 0.78 10.05
    Exp-ml 57.0 11.3 34.8 0.097 0.89 11.34
    Exp-tw 79.4 11.1 44.8 0.075 0.99 11.62
    Exp-kt 116.2 11.1 76.4 0.088 1.02 11.46
    Download: Download as CSV

    Table  3   Station numbers at different rainfall thresholds against 605 observation stations from mainland China and Taiwan Island, based on the observed and simulated 24-h accumulated rainfall on 8 August 2009

    Rainfall threshold (mm) Station numbers at different rainfall thresholds
    OBS CTRL Exp-all Exp-dbz Exp-rv Exp-ml Exp-tw Exp-kt
    100 270 224 250 221 240 252 247 245
    200 205 132 165 159 157 174 164 123
    300 163 59 94 96 95 104 108 77
    400 122 31 67 62 49 56 75 45
    500 89 20 45 37 26 32 48 30
    600 63 7 25 23 18 21 27 18
    700 47 3 16 16 9 13 17 12
    800 35 1 11 11 7 8 9 5
    900 30 0 10 5 0 3 8 5
    1000 24 0 7 1 0 2 7 4
    1100 13 0 4 0 0 1 4 2
    1200 10 0 2 0 0 0 1 0
    1300 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
    1400 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    1500 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    Download: Download as CSV
  • Chanson, H., 2010: The impact of Typhoon Morakot on the southern Taiwan coast. Shore Beach, 78, 33–37.
    Chien, F. -C., and H. -C. Kuo, 2011: On the extreme rainfall of Typhoon Morakot (2009). J. Geophys. Res., 116, D05104. doi: 10.1029/2010JD015092
    Crum, T. D., R. L. Albert, and D. W. Burgess, 1993: Recording, archiving, and using WSR-88D data. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 74, 645–653. doi: 10.1175/1520-0477(1993)074<0645:RAAUWD>2.0.CO;2
    Dong, J., and M. Xue, 2013: Assimilation of radial velocity and reflectivity data from coastal WSR-88D radars using an ensemble Kalman filter for the analysis and forecast of landfalling Hurricane Ike (2008). Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 139, 467–487. doi: 10.1002/qj.1970
    Dudhia, J., 1989: Numerical study of convection observed during the winter monsoon experiment using amesoscale two-dimensional model. J. Atmos. Sci., 46, 3077–3107. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1989)046<3077:NSOCOD>2.0.CO;2
    Fang, X., Y. -H. Kuo, and A. Wang, 2011: The impacts of Taiwan topography on the predictability of Typhoon Morakot’s record-breaking rainfall: A high-resolution ensemble simulation. Wea. Forecasting, 26, 613–633. doi: 10.1175/WAF-D-10-05020.1
    Fast, J. D., and R. C. Easter, 2006: A lagrangian particle dispersion model compatible with WRF. 7th Annual WRF User’s Workshop. NCAR, June 19–22, Boulder, CO, P6.2.
    Ge, X., T. Li, S. Zhang, et al., 2010: What causes the extremely heavy rainfall in Taiwan during Typhoon Morakot (2009). Atmos. Sci. Lett., 11, 46–50.
    Hall, J. D., M. Xue, L. Ran, et al., 2013: High-resolution modeling of Typhoon Morakot (2009): Vortex Rossby waves and their role in extreme precipitation over Taiwan. J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 163–186. doi: 10.1175/JAS-D-11-0338.1
    Hendricks, E. A., J. R. Moskaitis, Y. Jin, et al., 2011: Prediction and diagnosis of Typhoon Morakot (2009) using the Naval Research Laboratory’s mesoscale tropical cyclone model. Terr. Atmos. Oceanic Sci., 22, 579–594. doi: 10.3319/TAO.2011.05.30.01(TM)
    Hong, C. -C., M. -Y. Lee, H. -H. Hsu, et al., 2010: Role of submonthly disturbance and 40–50-day ISO on the extreme rainfall event associated with Typhoon Morakot (2009) in southern Taiwan. Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L08805. doi: 10.1029/2010GL042761
    Hong, S. -Y., J. Dudhia, and S. -H. Chen, 2004: A revised approach to ice microphysical processes for the bulk parameterization of clouds and precipitation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 103–120. doi: 10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<0103:ARATIM>2.0.CO;2
    Howard, K., M. Splitt, S. Lazarus, et al., 2009: The impact of atmospheric model resolution on a coupled wind/wave forecast system. Preprints, 16th Conference on Air–Sea Interaction, Phoenix, Arizona, Amer. Meteor. Soc., CD-ROM P9.2.
    Hu, M., M. Xue, and K. Brewster, 2006a: 3DVAR and cloud analysis with WSR-88D level-II data for the prediction of Fort Worth tornadic thunderstorms. Part I: Cloud analysis and its impact. Mon. Weather Rev., 134, 675–698. doi: 10.1175/MWR3092.1
    Hu, M., M. Xue, J. Gao, et al., 2006b: 3DVAR and cloud analysis with WSR-88D level-II data for the prediction of Fort Worth tornadic thunderstorms. Part II: Impact of radial velocity analysis via 3DVAR. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 699–721. doi: 10.1175/MWR3093.1
    Huang, H. -L., M. -J. Yang, and C. -H. Sui, 2014: Water budget and precipitation efficiency of Typhoon Morakot (2009). J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 112–129. doi: 10.1175/JAS-D-13-053.1
    Jou, B. J. -D., Y.-C. Yu, F. Lei, et al., 2012: Synoptic environment and rainfall characteristics of Typhoon Morakot (0908). J. Atmos. Sci., 38, 21–38.
    Lamberton, N., M. Splitt, S. Lazarus, et al., 2009: Assimilation of nearshore winds into a high-resolution atmosphere/wave modeling system. Preprints, 13th Symposium on Integrated Observing and Assimilation Systems for the Atmosphere, Oceans, and Land Surface (IOAS-AOLS), Phoenix, Arizona, Amer. Meteor. Soc., CD-ROM 5B.2.
    Lee, C. -S., C. -C. Wu, T. -C. C. Wang, et al., 2011: Advances in understanding the " perfect monsoon-influenced typhoon”: Summary from International Conference on Typhoon Morakot (2009). Asia–Pacific J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 213–222. doi: 10.1007/s13143-011-0010-2
    Lin, I. -I., M. -D. Chou, and C. -C. Wu, 2011: The impact of a warm ocean eddy on Typhoon Morakot (2009): A preliminary study from satellite observations and numerical modelling. Terr. Atmos. Oceanic Sci., 22, 661–671. doi: 10.3319/TAO.2011.08.19.01(TM)
    Mlawer, E. J., and S. A. Clough, 1997: On the extension of RRTM to the shortwave region. In Proceedings of the Sixth Atmospheric Measurement (ARM) Science Team Meeting, CONF-9603149, U. S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C., 223–226.
    Nguyen, H. V., and Y. -L. Chen, 2011: High-resolution initialization and simulations of Typhoon Morakot (2009). Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 1463–1491. doi: 10.1175/2011MWR3505.1
    Oye, R., C. Mueller, and S. Smith, 1995: Software for radar translation, visualization, editing, and interpolation. Preprints, 29th International Radar Meteor. Conf., AMS, Vail, Colorado, 9–13 July 1995, 359–361.
    Schwartz, C. S., Z. Liu, Y. Chen, and X. –Y. Huang, 2012: Impact of assimilating microwave radiances with a limited-area ensemble data assimilation system on forecasts of Typhoon Morakot. Wea. Forecasting, 27, 424–437. doi: 10.1175/WAF-D-11-00033.1
    Skamarock, W. C., and Coauthors, 2008: A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-4751STR, 113 pp.
    Stohl, A., C. Forster, A. Frank, et al., 2005: Technical note: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 4739–4799. doi: 10.5194/acpd-5-4739-2005
    Wang, C. -C., H. -C. Kuo, Y. -H. Chen, et al., 2012: Effects of asymmetric latent heating on typhoon movement crossing Taiwan: The case of Morakot (2009) with extreme rainfall. J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 3172–3196. doi: 10.1175/JAS-D-11-0346.1
    Wang, S. -T., 1980: Prediction of the behavior and intensity of typhoons in Taiwan and its vicinity. Research Rep. 018, Taipei, Taiwan, 100 pp. (in Chinese)
    Wang, T.-C., Y. -S. Tang, C. -H. Wei, et al., 2010: The precipitation characteristics of Typhoon Morakot (2009) from radar analyses. Chinese J. Atmos. Sci., 38, 39–61. (in Chinese)
    Wang, Y., 2009: How do outer spiral rainbands affect tropical cyclone structure and intensity? J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 1250–1273. doi: 10.1175/2008JAS2737.1
    Wei, C. -H., Y. -C. Chuang, T. -H. Hor, et al., 2014: Dual-Doppler radar investigation of a convective rainband during the impact of the southwesterly monsoonal flow on the circulation of Typhoon Morakot (2009). J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 92, 363–383. doi: 10.2151/jmsj.2014-406
    Wu, C. -C., 2001: Numerical simulation of Typhoon Gladys (1994) and its interaction with Taiwan terrain using the GFDL hurricane model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 1533–1549. doi: 10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<1533:NSOTGA>2.0.CO;2
    Wu, C. -C., 2013: Typhoon Morakot: Key findings from the Journal TAO for improving prediction of extreme rains at landfall. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 94, 155–160. doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00155.1
    Wu, L., J. Liang, and C. -C. Wu, 2011: Monsoonal influence on Typhoon Morakot (2009). Part I: Observational analysis. J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 2208–2221. doi: 10.1175/2011JAS3730.1
    Xie, B., and F. Zhang, 2012: Impacts of Typhoon Track and island topography on the heavy rainfalls in Taiwan associated with Morakot (2009). Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 3379–3394. doi: 10.1175/MWR-D-11-00240.1
    Xu, J., and Y. Wang, 2010: Sensitivity of the simulated tropical cyclone inner-core size to the initial vortex size. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 4135–4157. doi: 10.1175/2010MWR3335.1
    Xue, M., K. K. Droegemeier, and V. Wong, 2000: The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS)—A multi-scale nonhydrostatic atmospheric simulation and prediction tool. Part I: Model dynamics and verification. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 75, 161–193. doi: 10.1007/s007030070003
    Xue, M., D.-H. Wang, J.-D. Gao, et al., 2003: The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS), storm-scale numerical weather prediction and data assimilation. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 82, 139–170. doi: 10.1007/s00703-001-0595-6
    Yu, C.-K., and L.-W. Cheng, 2013: Distribution and mechanisms of orographic precipitation associated with Typhoon Morakot (2009). J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 2894–2915. doi: 10.1175/JAS-D-12-0340.1
    Zhang, F. Q., Y. Weng, Y. -H. Kuo, et al., 2010: Predicting Typhoon Morakot’s catastrophic rainfall with a convection-permitting mesoscale ensemble system. Wea. Forecasting, 25, 1816–1825. doi: 10.1175/2010WAF2222414.1
    Zhao, K., and M. Xue , 2009: Assimilation of coastal Doppler radar data with the ARPS 3DVAR and cloud analysis for the prediction of Hurricane Ike (2008). Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L12803. doi: 10.1029/2009GL038658
    Zhao, K., X. Li, M. Xue, et al., 2012: Short-term forecasting through intermittent assimilation of data from Taiwan and mainland China coastal radars for Typhoon Meranti (2010) at landfall. J. Geophys. Res., 117, D06108. doi: 10.1029/2011JD017109
    Zhao, Q., and Y. Jin, 2008: High-resolution radar data assimilation for Hurricane Isabel (2003) at landfall. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 89, 1355–1372. doi: 10.1175/2008BAMS2562.1
  • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. Nan Yang, Chong Wang, Xiaofeng Li. Evaluation of precipitation forecasting methods and an advanced lightweight model. Environmental Research Letters, 2024, 19(9): 094006. DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/ad661f
    2. Jiajun Chen, Dongmei Xu, Aiqing Shu, et al. The Impact of Radar Radial Velocity Data Assimilation Using WRF-3DVAR System with Different Background Error Length Scales on the Forecast of Super Typhoon Lekima (2019). Remote Sensing, 2023, 15(10): 2592. DOI:10.3390/rs15102592
    3. Zongmei Pan, Shuwen Zhang, Weidong Zhang. Impact of Radar and Surface Data Assimilation on the Forecast of a Nocturnal Squall Line in the Yangtze–Huaihe River. Atmosphere, 2022, 13(9): 1522. DOI:10.3390/atmos13091522
    4. Shiwei Yu, Zhizhao Liu. Temporal and Spatial Impact of Precipitable Water Vapor on GPS Relative Positioning During the Tropical Cyclone Hato (2017) in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Earth and Space Science, 2021, 8(4) DOI:10.1029/2020EA001371
    5. Wei Zhang, Gabriele Villarini, Enrico Scoccimarro, et al. Tropical cyclone precipitation in the HighResMIP atmosphere-only experiments of the PRIMAVERA Project. Climate Dynamics, 2021, 57(1-2): 253. DOI:10.1007/s00382-021-05707-x
    6. Chih-Chien Tsai, Kao-Shen Chung. Sensitivities of Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts for Typhoon Soudelor (2015) near Landfall to Polarimetric Radar Data Assimilation. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(22): 3711. DOI:10.3390/rs12223711
    7. Xiantong Liu, Qilin Wan, Hong Wang, et al. Raindrop Size Distribution Parameters Retrieved from Guangzhou S-band Polarimetric Radar Observations. Journal of Meteorological Research, 2018, 32(4): 571. DOI:10.1007/s13351-018-7152-4
    8. Zifeng Yu, Yuqing Wang. Extreme Weather. DOI:10.5772/intechopen.75910

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return